Demographics details for Pulaski, WI vs New iberia, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, WI vs New iberia, LA.
| Data | Pulaski | New iberia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,045 | 27,473 |
| Median Age | 29.1 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $65,906 | $47,108 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs New iberia
- The population in New iberia is higher at 27,473, compared to 4,045 in Pulaski.
- The median age in New iberia is higher at 34.9 years, compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $65,906 compared to $47,108 in New iberia.
- In New iberia, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- The poverty level is higher in New iberia at 20%, compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- New iberia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs New iberia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | New iberia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 46 |
| White | 84 | 42 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs New iberia
- In New iberia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 42% in New iberia.
- Both Pulaski and New iberia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- New iberia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pulaski at 10% compared to 6% in New iberia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in New iberia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | New iberia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.7% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 45.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs New iberia
- In New iberia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New iberia at 27.0% versus 22.4% in Pulaski.
- New iberia has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 14.6% in Pulaski.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 15.6% in New iberia.
- New iberia has higher obesity rates at 45.6% compared to 35.4% in Pulaski.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New iberia at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | New iberia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (16) | 1.3% (345) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (715) | 21.7% (5,975) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (191) | 18.7% (5,143) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (432) | 10.7% (2,944) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs New iberia
- In New iberia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Pulaski.
- In New iberia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New iberia at 18.7%, compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Pulaski and New iberia at 10.7%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.