Demographics details for Pulaski, WI vs Brownfield, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, WI vs Brownfield, TX.
| Data | Pulaski | Brownfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,045 | 8,717 |
| Median Age | 29.1 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $65,906 | $41,228 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Brownfield
- The population in Brownfield is higher at 8,717, compared to 4,045 in Pulaski.
- The median age in Brownfield is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $65,906 compared to $41,228 in Brownfield.
- In Brownfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pulaski and Brownfield at 10%.
- Brownfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Brownfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Brownfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 84 | 45 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 30 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Brownfield
- In Brownfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 45% in Brownfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Pulaski at 2% compared to 0% in Brownfield.
- Brownfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brownfield at 30%, compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in Brownfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Brownfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.7% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Brownfield
- In Brownfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brownfield at 23.8% versus 22.4% in Pulaski.
- Brownfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 14.6% in Pulaski.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 16.8% in Brownfield.
- Brownfield has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 35.4% in Pulaski.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brownfield at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Brownfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (16) | 2.6% (229) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (715) | 18.9% (1,651) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (191) | 31.1% (2,709) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (432) | 5.4% (475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Brownfield
- In Brownfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Pulaski.
- In Brownfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brownfield at 31.1%, compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 5.4% in Brownfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.