Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Woodstock, GA.
| Data | Pulaski | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,706 | 37,350 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,740 | $100,913 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 33,706 in Pulaski.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $59,740 in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 11 |
| White | 90 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 5% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Pulaski.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Woodstock
- More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 0.3% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 8.2% (3,052) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 3.7% (1,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 16.0% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.