Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Winchester, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Winchester, TN.
| Data | Pulaski | Winchester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,706 | 9,859 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,740 | $58,054 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Winchester
- In Pulaski, the population is higher at 33,706, compared to 9,859 in Winchester.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 43.6 years in Winchester.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $59,740 compared to $58,054 in Winchester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Winchester.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pulaski and Winchester at 12%.
- Winchester has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Winchester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Winchester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 10 |
| White | 90 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Winchester
- In Winchester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 73% in Winchester.
- Both Pulaski and Winchester have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Winchester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Winchester at 5%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- In Winchester, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pulaski.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Winchester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Winchester
- In Winchester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Winchester at 27.0% versus 24.8% in Pulaski.
- Winchester has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 18.5% in Pulaski.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 15.8% in Winchester.
- Winchester has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 37.7% in Pulaski.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Winchester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Winchester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 1.1% (110) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 19.3% (1,906) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 13.6% (1,340) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 17.7% (1,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Winchester
- In Winchester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 19.3% in Winchester.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 13.6% in Winchester.
- In Winchester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 16.0% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.