Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Richlands, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Richlands, NC.
| Data | Pulaski | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,706 | 2,355 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $59,740 | $59,333 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Richlands
- In Pulaski, the population is higher at 33,706, compared to 2,355 in Richlands.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $59,740 compared to $59,333 in Richlands.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 41.0% in Richlands.
- Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Richlands provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 17 |
| White | 90 | 65 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Richlands
- In Richlands, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 5% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 65% in Richlands.
- Both Pulaski and Richlands have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Richlands has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richlands at 7%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Richlands at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Richlands
- More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Richlands.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 23.5% in Richlands.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Richlands.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 17.4% in Richlands.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 36.7% in Richlands.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 0.8% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 18.9% (445) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 11.6% (273) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 17.3% (408) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Richlands
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Richlands.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 18.9% in Richlands.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 11.6% in Richlands.
- In Richlands, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.