Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Kosciusko, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Kosciusko, MS.

Data Pulaski Kosciusko
Population 33,706 6,922
Median Age 47.2 years 36.2 years
Median Income $59,740 $33,719
Married Families 43.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 12% 22%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 6.5

Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Kosciusko

  • In Pulaski, the population is higher at 33,706, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
  • Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
  • Pulaski has a higher median income of $59,740 compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
  • The poverty level is higher in Kosciusko at 22%, compared to 12% in Pulaski.
  • Kosciusko has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.

Demographics

Demographics Pulaski vs Kosciusko provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pulaski Kosciusko
Black 5 53
White 90 42
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Kosciusko

  • In Kosciusko, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 5% in Pulaski.
  • Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in Kosciusko.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Pulaski and Kosciusko at 2%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kosciusko at 3%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Kosciusko at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pulaski Kosciusko
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 16.2%
Depression 24.8% 22.8%
Smoking 18.5% 26.1%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 11.3%
Obesity 37.7% 46.0%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Kosciusko

  • In Kosciusko, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 22.8% in Kosciusko.
  • Kosciusko has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 18.5% in Pulaski.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
  • Kosciusko has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 37.7% in Pulaski.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Kosciusko.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pulaski Kosciusko
No Schooling 1.0% (331) 0.6% (39)
High School Diploma 21.0% (7,088) 18.4% (1,276)
Less than High School 14.0% (4,706) 9.0% (624)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (5,382) 12.8% (886)

Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Kosciusko

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
  • More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 12.8% in Kosciusko.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.