Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Greenwich, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Greenwich, CT.
| Data | Pulaski | Greenwich |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,706 | 62,396 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $59,740 | $250,000 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 62.2% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Greenwich
- The population in Greenwich is higher at 62,396, compared to 33,706 in Pulaski.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 42.3 years in Greenwich.
- Greenwich has a higher median income of $250,000, compared to $59,740 in Pulaski.
- In Greenwich, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.2%, compared to 43.0% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Greenwich.
- The unemployment rate in Pulaski is higher at 2.9%, compared to 2.3% in Greenwich.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Greenwich provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Greenwich |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 90 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Greenwich
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pulaski at 5% compared to 2% in Greenwich.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 80% in Greenwich.
- In Greenwich, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Pulaski.
- Greenwich has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- Both Pulaski and Greenwich have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Greenwich at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Greenwich |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Greenwich
- More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Greenwich |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Greenwich
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.