Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Greensboro, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Greensboro, VT.
| Data | Pulaski | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,706 | 102 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 67.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,740 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Greensboro
- In Pulaski, the population is higher at 33,706, compared to 102 in Greensboro.
- The median age in Greensboro is higher at 67.0 years, compared to 47.2 years in Pulaski.
- Greensboro has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $59,740 in Pulaski.
- In Greensboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 43.0% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Greensboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 90 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Greensboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pulaski at 5% compared to 0% in Greensboro.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 89% in Greensboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in Greensboro.
- Greensboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greensboro at 6%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Greensboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Greensboro
- More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.2% in Greensboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greensboro at 27.0% versus 24.8% in Pulaski.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Greensboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Greensboro at 18.3% compared to 18.2% in Pulaski.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 29.2% in Greensboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Greensboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Greensboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 2.0% (2) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 57.8% (59) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Greensboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Greensboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 2.0% in Greensboro.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Greensboro.
- In Greensboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 57.8% compared to 16.0% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.