Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Dike, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Dike, TX.
Data | Pulaski | Dike |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,706 | 103 |
Median Age | 47.2 years | 44.0 years |
Median Income | $59,740 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Dike
- In Pulaski, the population is higher at 33,706, compared to 103 in Dike.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 44.0 years in Dike.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $59,740 compared to $50,000 in Dike.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 20.0% in Dike.
- The poverty level is higher in Dike at 15%, compared to 12% in Pulaski.
- Dike has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Dike provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pulaski | Dike |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 90 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Dike
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pulaski at 5% compared to 0% in Dike.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dike at 100% compared to 90% in Pulaski.
- The Asian population is larger in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in Dike.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pulaski at 2% compared to 0% in Dike.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pulaski at 2% compared to 0% in Dike.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Dike at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pulaski | Dike |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 37.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Dike
- More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pulaski | Dike |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Dike
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Dike.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.