Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Bell gardens, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Bell gardens, CA.
Data | Pulaski | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,706 | 37,927 |
Median Age | 47.2 years | 31.1 years |
Median Income | $59,740 | $53,935 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 6.7 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Bell gardens
- The population in Bell gardens is higher at 37,927, compared to 33,706 in Pulaski.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $59,740 compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- The poverty level is higher in Bell gardens at 15%, compared to 12% in Pulaski.
- Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pulaski | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 1 |
White | 90 | -35 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 99 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 34 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Bell gardens
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pulaski at 5% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- The Asian population is larger in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pulaski.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pulaski | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 17.9% |
Depression | 24.8% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.3% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Bell gardens
- In Bell gardens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Bell gardens.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 18.2% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 37.2% in Bell gardens.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pulaski | Bell gardens |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 4.5% (1,722) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 16.9% (6,418) |
Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 60.8% (23,053) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 3.9% (1,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Bell gardens
- In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 1.0% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 16.9% in Bell gardens.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.