Demographics details for Provo, UT vs Winchester, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Provo, UT vs Winchester, VA.
Data | Provo | Winchester |
---|---|---|
Population | 113,523 | 27,936 |
Median Age | 23.6 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $57,943 | $62,495 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Provo vs Winchester
- In Provo, the population is higher at 113,523, compared to 27,936 in Winchester.
- The median age in Winchester is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Winchester has a higher median income of $62,495, compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Provo at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Winchester.
- Provo has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Winchester.
- The unemployment rate in Provo is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.1% in Winchester.
Demographics
Demographics Provo vs Winchester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Provo | Winchester |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 10 |
White | 69 | 60 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 18 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Provo vs Winchester
- In Winchester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Provo.
- Provo has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 60% in Winchester.
- Both Provo and Winchester have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Winchester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 18% in Provo.
- Both Provo and Winchester have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Provo at 1% compared to 0% in Winchester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Provo | Winchester |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.1% |
Depression | 24.5% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 8.4% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 7.3% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Provo vs Winchester
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Provo and Winchester at 16.3%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Provo at 24.5% compared to 22.7% in Winchester.
- Winchester has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Winchester at 16.5% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Winchester has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winchester at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Provo | Winchester |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (663) | 0.7% (207) |
High School Diploma | 4.6% (5,209) | 15.0% (4,203) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (6,435) | 15.9% (4,448) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (20,752) | 21.7% (6,065) |
Education Levels Comparison: Provo vs Winchester
- In Winchester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- In Winchester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winchester at 15.9%, compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Winchester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.