Demographics details for Provo, UT vs Wilmington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Provo, UT vs Wilmington, NC.
| Data | Provo | Wilmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,523 | 120,324 |
| Median Age | 23.6 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,943 | $58,908 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Provo vs Wilmington
- The population in Wilmington is higher at 120,324, compared to 113,523 in Provo.
- The median age in Wilmington is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Wilmington has a higher median income of $58,908, compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Provo at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Wilmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Wilmington at 12%, compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Provo is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in Wilmington.
Demographics
Demographics Provo vs Wilmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Provo | Wilmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 16 |
| White | 69 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Provo vs Wilmington
- In Wilmington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wilmington at 71% compared to 69% in Provo.
- The Asian population is larger in Provo at 2% compared to 1% in Wilmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Provo at 18% compared to 7% in Wilmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Provo at 9% compared to 5% in Wilmington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Provo at 1% compared to 0% in Wilmington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Provo | Wilmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 7.3% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Provo vs Wilmington
- In Wilmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wilmington at 25.0% versus 24.5% in Provo.
- Wilmington has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wilmington at 18.5% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Provo at 33.5% compared to 33.2% in Wilmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wilmington at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Provo | Wilmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (663) | 0.5% (560) |
| High School Diploma | 4.6% (5,209) | 10.5% (12,679) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (6,435) | 7.1% (8,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (20,752) | 28.5% (34,319) |
Education Levels Comparison: Provo vs Wilmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Provo have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Wilmington.
- In Wilmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wilmington at 7.1%, compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Wilmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.