Demographics details for Provo, UT vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Provo, UT vs Washington, IN.
| Data | Provo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,523 | 12,171 |
| Median Age | 23.6 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,943 | $48,255 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Provo vs Washington
- In Provo, the population is higher at 113,523, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Provo is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Provo vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Provo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 69 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Provo vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 76% compared to 69% in Provo.
- The Asian population is larger in Provo at 2% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Provo at 18% compared to 12% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Provo at 9% compared to 8% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Provo at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Provo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 7.3% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Provo vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 24.5% in Provo.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 16.3% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Provo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (663) | 1.3% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 4.6% (5,209) | 22.8% (2,771) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (6,435) | 20.2% (2,460) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (20,752) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Provo vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 20.2%, compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Provo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.