Demographics details for Provo, UT vs South gate, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Provo, UT vs South gate, CA.
| Data | Provo | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,523 | 90,926 |
| Median Age | 23.6 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $57,943 | $67,188 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Provo vs South gate
- In Provo, the population is higher at 113,523, compared to 90,926 in South gate.
- The median age in South gate is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- South gate has a higher median income of $67,188, compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Provo at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 11% in Provo.
- South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Provo vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Provo | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 69 | -21 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 97 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 21 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Provo vs South gate
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Provo and South gate at 1%.
- Provo has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to -21% in South gate.
- The Asian population is larger in Provo at 2% compared to 1% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 18% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 9% in Provo.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Provo and South gate at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Provo | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 7.3% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Provo vs South gate
- In South gate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Provo at 24.5% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South gate at 14.5% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- South gate has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Provo at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Provo | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (663) | 4.6% (4,160) |
| High School Diploma | 4.6% (5,209) | 14.9% (13,536) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (6,435) | 53.3% (48,481) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (20,752) | 7.5% (6,822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Provo vs South gate
- In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- In South gate, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Provo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.