Demographics details for Provo, UT vs Kelso, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Provo, UT vs Kelso, TN.
| Data | Provo | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113,523 | 185 |
| Median Age | 23.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,943 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 70.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Provo vs Kelso
- In Provo, the population is higher at 113,523, compared to 185 in Kelso.
- The median age in Kelso is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Kelso has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- In Kelso, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Kelso at 13%, compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Provo is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Kelso.
Demographics
Demographics Provo vs Kelso provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Provo | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Provo vs Kelso
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Provo at 1% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kelso at 100% compared to 69% in Provo.
- The Asian population is larger in Provo at 2% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Provo at 18% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Provo at 9% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Provo at 1% compared to 0% in Kelso.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Provo | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 8.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 7.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Provo vs Kelso
- More residents in Provo report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Depression is more prevalent in Provo at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Provo at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Binge drinking is more common in Provo at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Obesity rates are higher in Provo at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Disability percentages are higher in Provo at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Provo | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (663) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 4.6% (5,209) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (6,435) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (20,752) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Provo vs Kelso
- A higher percentage of residents in Provo have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Provo hold a high school diploma at 4.6% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- More residents in Provo have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Provo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.