Demographics details for Prince frederick, MD vs Midland, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prince frederick, MD vs Midland, TX.

Data Prince frederick Midland
Population 2,491 134,444
Median Age 38.9 years 31.4 years
Median Income $61,293 $90,448
Married Families 33.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 2.9

Population Comparison: Prince frederick vs Midland

  • The population in Midland is higher at 134,444, compared to 2,491 in Prince frederick.
  • Residents in Prince frederick have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 31.4 years in Midland.
  • Midland has a higher median income of $90,448, compared to $61,293 in Prince frederick.
  • In Midland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Prince frederick.
  • The poverty level is higher in Midland at 12%, compared to 6% in Prince frederick.
  • The unemployment rate in Prince frederick is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.9% in Midland.

Demographics

Demographics Prince frederick vs Midland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prince frederick Midland
Black 28 8
White 49 29
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 13 45
Two or More Races 8 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Prince frederick vs Midland

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Prince frederick at 28% compared to 8% in Midland.
  • Prince frederick has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 29% in Midland.
  • Both Prince frederick and Midland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • Midland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 13% in Prince frederick.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Midland at 15%, compared to 8% in Prince frederick.
  • In Midland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Prince frederick.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prince frederick Midland
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 16.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 11.1%
Depression 19.6% 21.4%
Smoking 15.6% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 18.6%
Obesity 38.7% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prince frederick vs Midland

  • More residents in Prince frederick report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.1% in Midland.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Midland at 21.4% versus 19.6% in Prince frederick.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Prince frederick at 15.6% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Midland at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Prince frederick.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Prince frederick at 38.7% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prince frederick at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prince frederick Midland
No Schooling 0.4% (10) 2.8% (3,705)
High School Diploma 19.1% (476) 10.2% (13,724)
Less than High School 9.7% (242) 17.6% (23,705)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (358) 19.5% (26,213)

Education Levels Comparison: Prince frederick vs Midland

  • In Midland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.4% in Prince frederick.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prince frederick hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Midland at 17.6%, compared to 9.7% in Prince frederick.
  • In Midland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 14.4% in Prince frederick.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.