Demographics details for Prescott, AZ vs Randleman, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott, AZ vs Randleman, NC.
Data | Prescott | Randleman |
---|---|---|
Population | 47,603 | 4,642 |
Median Age | 60.5 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $66,330 | $63,040 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Prescott vs Randleman
- In Prescott, the population is higher at 47,603, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
- Residents in Prescott have a higher median age of 60.5 years compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
- Prescott has a higher median income of $66,330 compared to $63,040 in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Randleman.
- The poverty level is identical in both Prescott and Randleman at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Prescott is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Randleman.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Prescott | Randleman |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 4 |
White | 84 | 77 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott vs Randleman
- In Randleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Prescott.
- Prescott has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- The Asian population is larger in Prescott at 2% compared to 0% in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 4% in Prescott.
- In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Prescott.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Prescott | Randleman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.0% |
Depression | 21.7% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 19.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 26.1% | 37.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott vs Randleman
- In Randleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.8% in Prescott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Randleman at 25.7% versus 21.7% in Prescott.
- Randleman has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 14.9% in Prescott.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 17.5% in Prescott.
- Randleman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 26.1% in Prescott.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Prescott.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Prescott | Randleman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (139) | 0.3% (16) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (5,770) | 16.5% (768) |
Less than High School | 6.2% (2,941) | 22.1% (1,026) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (14,785) | 6.9% (320) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott vs Randleman
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Prescott and Randleman at 0.3%.
- In Randleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 12.1% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 6.2% in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.