Demographics details for Prescott, AZ vs Leominster, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott, AZ vs Leominster, MA.
| Data | Prescott | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,603 | 43,646 |
| Median Age | 60.5 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,330 | $75,620 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Prescott vs Leominster
- In Prescott, the population is higher at 47,603, compared to 43,646 in Leominster.
- Residents in Prescott have a higher median age of 60.5 years compared to 43.0 years in Leominster.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620, compared to $66,330 in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
- Prescott has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Leominster.
- Leominster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Prescott.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Prescott | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 84 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott vs Leominster
- In Leominster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Prescott.
- Prescott has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 67% in Leominster.
- In Leominster, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Prescott.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 8% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 4% in Prescott.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott at 1% compared to 0% in Leominster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Prescott | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 26.1% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.8% in Prescott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leominster at 23.5% versus 21.7% in Prescott.
- Leominster has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Prescott.
- Binge drinking is more common in Prescott at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Leominster.
- Leominster has higher obesity rates at 32.8% compared to 26.1% in Prescott.
- Disability percentages are higher in Prescott at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Prescott | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (139) | 1.1% (477) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (5,770) | 18.2% (7,932) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,941) | 13.5% (5,889) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (14,785) | 24.1% (10,530) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Prescott.
- In Leominster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 12.1% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leominster at 13.5%, compared to 6.2% in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 24.1% in Leominster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.