Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Topeka, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Topeka, KS.
Data | Prescott valley | Topeka |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,075 | 125,449 |
Median Age | 47.7 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $66,617 | $54,052 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Topeka
- The population in Topeka is higher at 125,449, compared to 49,075 in Prescott valley.
- Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 37.9 years in Topeka.
- Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $54,052 in Topeka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Topeka.
- The poverty level is higher in Topeka at 14%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
- Topeka has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott valley vs Topeka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Prescott valley | Topeka |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 10 |
White | 67 | 62 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 19 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Topeka
- In Topeka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
- Prescott valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 62% in Topeka.
- In Topeka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Prescott valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 16% in Topeka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 9% in Topeka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Prescott valley and Topeka at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Prescott valley | Topeka |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 11.3% |
Depression | 22.8% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 28.1% | 41.0% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Topeka
- More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Topeka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Topeka at 25.5% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
- Topeka has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Topeka at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
- Topeka has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Topeka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Prescott valley | Topeka |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (399) | 1.1% (1,326) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (8,386) | 17.2% (21,594) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (6,044) | 10.9% (13,657) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (7,817) | 19.3% (24,214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Topeka
- In Topeka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Prescott valley.
- In Topeka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
- More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 10.9% in Topeka.
- In Topeka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.