Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Tappahannock, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Tappahannock, VA.

Data Prescott valley Tappahannock
Population 49,075 2,192
Median Age 47.7 years 48.2 years
Median Income $66,617 $40,703
Married Families 43.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.0

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Tappahannock

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 2,192 in Tappahannock.
  • The median age in Tappahannock is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 47.7 years in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $40,703 in Tappahannock.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 27.0% in Tappahannock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tappahannock at 12%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Prescott valley is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.0% in Tappahannock.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Tappahannock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Tappahannock
Black 1 42
White 67 51
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 19 2
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Tappahannock

  • In Tappahannock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 51% in Tappahannock.
  • Both Prescott valley and Tappahannock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 2% in Tappahannock.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 4% in Tappahannock.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Tappahannock.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Tappahannock
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 13.1%
Depression 22.8% 22.4%
Smoking 18.5% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.1%
Obesity 28.1% 44.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Tappahannock

  • In Tappahannock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 22.8% compared to 22.4% in Tappahannock.
  • Tappahannock has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
  • Tappahannock has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Tappahannock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Tappahannock
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 18.8% (411)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 8.4% (185)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 14.1% (309)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Tappahannock

  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Tappahannock.
  • In Tappahannock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 8.4% in Tappahannock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.