Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Southfield, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Southfield, MI.

Data Prescott valley Southfield
Population 49,075 75,431
Median Age 47.7 years 42.1 years
Median Income $66,617 $63,980
Married Families 43.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 6.2

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Southfield

  • The population in Southfield is higher at 75,431, compared to 49,075 in Prescott valley.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 42.1 years in Southfield.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $63,980 in Southfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Southfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Southfield at 13%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • Southfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Southfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Southfield
Black 1 66
White 67 23
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 19 2
Two or More Races 11 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Southfield

  • In Southfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 23% in Southfield.
  • In Southfield, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 2% in Southfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 7% in Southfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Southfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Southfield
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 9.9%
Depression 22.8% 17.6%
Smoking 18.5% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.9%
Obesity 28.1% 38.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Southfield

  • More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.4% in Southfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 22.8% compared to 17.6% in Southfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Southfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Southfield.
  • Southfield has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southfield at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Prescott valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Southfield
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 1.2% (870)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 12.0% (9,038)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 6.1% (4,623)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 27.5% (20,760)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Southfield

  • In Southfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Prescott valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 12.0% in Southfield.
  • More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 6.1% in Southfield.
  • In Southfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.