Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Pantego, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Pantego, NC.

Data Prescott valley Pantego
Population 49,075 161
Median Age 47.7 years 9.4 years
Median Income $66,617 $67,292
Married Families 43.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.2

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pantego

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 161 in Pantego.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 9.4 years in Pantego.
  • Pantego has a higher median income of $67,292, compared to $66,617 in Prescott valley.
  • In Pantego, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 43.0% in Prescott valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Pantego at 10%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Prescott valley is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Pantego.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Pantego provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Pantego
Black 1 12
White 67 -248
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 168
Two or More Races 11 168
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pantego

  • In Pantego, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to -248% in Pantego.
  • The Asian population is larger in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Pantego.
  • Pantego has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 168%, compared to 19% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pantego at 168%, compared to 11% in Prescott valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Pantego.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Pantego
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 12.1%
Depression 22.8% 22.5%
Smoking 18.5% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 17.4%
Obesity 28.1% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pantego

  • More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.8% in Pantego.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 22.8% compared to 22.5% in Pantego.
  • Pantego has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pantego at 17.4% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Pantego has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pantego at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Prescott valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Pantego
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.6% (1)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 24.2% (39)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 10.6% (17)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 18.0% (29)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pantego

  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Pantego.
  • In Pantego, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 10.6% in Pantego.
  • In Pantego, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.