Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Pana, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Pana, IL.
| Data | Prescott valley | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,075 | 5,093 |
| Median Age | 47.7 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,617 | $47,763 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pana
- In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 5,093 in Pana.
- Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 41.7 years in Pana.
- Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $47,763 in Pana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- The poverty level is higher in Pana at 10%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
- Pana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott valley vs Pana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Prescott valley | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 67 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Pana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pana at 93% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
- Both Prescott valley and Pana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 3% in Pana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 3% in Pana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Pana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Prescott valley | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 28.1% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pana
- More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.9% in Pana.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 22.8%.
- Pana has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pana at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
- Pana has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Prescott valley and Pana at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Prescott valley | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (399) | 0.4% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (8,386) | 30.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (6,044) | 17.1% (870) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (7,817) | 11.0% (559) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Pana
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Pana.
- In Pana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.7% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pana at 17.1%, compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 11.0% in Pana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.