Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Ostrander, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Ostrander, MN.

Data Prescott valley Ostrander
Population 49,075 227
Median Age 47.7 years 37.8 years
Median Income $66,617 $69,583
Married Families 43.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 2.5

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Ostrander

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 227 in Ostrander.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 37.8 years in Ostrander.
  • Ostrander has a higher median income of $69,583, compared to $66,617 in Prescott valley.
  • In Ostrander, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 43.0% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Ostrander.
  • The unemployment rate in Prescott valley is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.5% in Ostrander.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Ostrander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Ostrander
Black 1 3
White 67 92
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Ostrander

  • In Ostrander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ostrander at 92% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Ostrander.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 0% in Ostrander.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 4% in Ostrander.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Prescott valley and Ostrander at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Ostrander
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 10.0%
Depression 22.8% 23.3%
Smoking 18.5% 19.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 20.8%
Obesity 28.1% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Ostrander

  • More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in Ostrander.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ostrander at 23.3% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Ostrander has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ostrander at 20.8% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Ostrander has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Ostrander.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Ostrander
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.9% (2)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 33.5% (76)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 17.6% (40)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 17.2% (39)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Ostrander

  • In Ostrander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Prescott valley.
  • In Ostrander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ostrander at 17.6%, compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
  • In Ostrander, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.