Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Meadville, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Meadville, PA.

Data Prescott valley Meadville
Population 49,075 12,680
Median Age 47.7 years 35.7 years
Median Income $66,617 $46,157
Married Families 43.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 5.0

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Meadville

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Meadville
Black 1 5
White 67 86
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 19 2
Two or More Races 11 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Meadville

  • In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
  • Both Prescott valley and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 2% in Meadville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 6% in Meadville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Meadville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Meadville
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 14.0%
Depression 22.8% 26.6%
Smoking 18.5% 24.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.6%
Obesity 28.1% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Meadville

  • In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • Binge drinking rates are similar in both Prescott valley and Meadville at 16.6%.
  • Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Prescott valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Meadville
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.2% (29)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 24.5% (3,110)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 8.6% (1,085)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 15.4% (1,953)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Meadville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
  • In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.