Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Holdenville, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Holdenville, OK.

Data Prescott valley Holdenville
Population 49,075 5,916
Median Age 47.7 years 36.1 years
Median Income $66,617 $38,232
Married Families 43.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 6% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.5

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Holdenville

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 5,916 in Holdenville.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 36.1 years in Holdenville.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $38,232 in Holdenville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 22.0% in Holdenville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Holdenville at 20%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • Holdenville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Holdenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Holdenville
Black 1 7
White 67 55
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 19 9
Two or More Races 11 8
American Indian 1 20

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Holdenville

  • In Holdenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 55% in Holdenville.
  • Both Prescott valley and Holdenville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 9% in Holdenville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 8% in Holdenville.
  • In Holdenville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 1% in Prescott valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Holdenville
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 20.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 16.2%
Depression 22.8% 24.6%
Smoking 18.5% 27.5%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.4%
Obesity 28.1% 43.3%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Holdenville

  • In Holdenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 18.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Holdenville at 24.6% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Holdenville has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Holdenville.
  • Holdenville has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Holdenville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Holdenville
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 1.1% (67)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 23.1% (1,369)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 24.9% (1,471)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 7.0% (415)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Holdenville

  • In Holdenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Prescott valley.
  • In Holdenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holdenville at 24.9%, compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 7.0% in Holdenville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.