Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Harbeson, DE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Harbeson, DE.

Data Prescott valley Harbeson
Population 49,075 336
Median Age 47.7 years 45.0 years
Median Income $66,617 $65,000
Married Families 43.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.0

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Harbeson

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 336 in Harbeson.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 45.0 years in Harbeson.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617 compared to $65,000 in Harbeson.
  • In Harbeson, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 43.0% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Harbeson.
  • Harbeson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Harbeson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Harbeson
Black 1 5
White 67 90
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 19 2
Two or More Races 11 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Harbeson

  • In Harbeson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Harbeson at 90% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
  • Both Prescott valley and Harbeson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 2% in Harbeson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 2% in Harbeson.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Harbeson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Harbeson
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% Data is updating%
Depression 22.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 18.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 28.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 16.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Harbeson

  • More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Prescott valley at 28.1% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Harbeson
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Harbeson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.