Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Freeport, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Freeport, MN.
Data | Prescott valley | Freeport |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,075 | 677 |
Median Age | 47.7 years | 29.9 years |
Median Income | $66,617 | $91,250 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Freeport
- In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 677 in Freeport.
- Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher median income of $91,250, compared to $66,617 in Prescott valley.
- In Freeport, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 43.0% in Prescott valley.
- Prescott valley has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Freeport.
- The unemployment rate in Prescott valley is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.5% in Freeport.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott valley vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Prescott valley | Freeport |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 67 | 82 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Freeport
- In Freeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeport at 82% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Freeport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 12% in Freeport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 4% in Freeport.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Freeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Prescott valley | Freeport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.3% |
Depression | 22.8% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 23.3% |
Obesity | 28.1% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Freeport
- More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.0% in Freeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Freeport at 23.7% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 18.5% compared to 17.2% in Freeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
- Freeport has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Prescott valley | Freeport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (399) | 0.3% (2) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (8,386) | 19.9% (135) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (6,044) | 9.2% (62) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (7,817) | 17.4% (118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Freeport
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Freeport.
- In Freeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 17.1% in Prescott valley.
- More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 9.2% in Freeport.
- In Freeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.