Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Bridgeport, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Bridgeport, WV.

Data Prescott valley Bridgeport
Population 49,075 9,310
Median Age 47.7 years 45.1 years
Median Income $66,617 $96,063
Married Families 43.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.5

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 9,310 in Bridgeport.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 45.1 years in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,063, compared to $66,617 in Prescott valley.
  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 43.0% in Prescott valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 8%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Bridgeport
Black 1 2
White 67 90
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 19 3
Two or More Races 11 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bridgeport at 90% compared to 67% in Prescott valley.
  • In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Prescott valley at 19% compared to 3% in Bridgeport.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 2% in Bridgeport.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prescott valley at 1% compared to 0% in Bridgeport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Bridgeport
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 9.5%
Depression 22.8% 24.8%
Smoking 18.5% 13.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 15.1%
Obesity 28.1% 32.2%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • More residents in Prescott valley report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.4% in Bridgeport.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bridgeport at 24.8% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Prescott valley at 18.5% compared to 13.3% in Bridgeport.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Bridgeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Bridgeport
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.1% (6)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 13.2% (1,231)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 4.0% (371)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 41.9% (3,903)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Bridgeport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 13.2% in Bridgeport.
  • More residents in Prescott valley have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 4.0% in Bridgeport.
  • In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.9% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.