Demographics details for Prescott valley, AZ vs Bridgeport, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prescott valley, AZ vs Bridgeport, TX.

Data Prescott valley Bridgeport
Population 49,075 6,321
Median Age 47.7 years 33.9 years
Median Income $66,617 $96,231
Married Families 43.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.2

Population Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • In Prescott valley, the population is higher at 49,075, compared to 6,321 in Bridgeport.
  • Residents in Prescott valley have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231, compared to $66,617 in Prescott valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott valley at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Bridgeport.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 10%, compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Prescott valley vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prescott valley Bridgeport
Black 1 5
White 67 51
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 19 36
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
  • Both Prescott valley and Bridgeport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 19% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Prescott valley at 11% compared to 5% in Bridgeport.
  • In Bridgeport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Prescott valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prescott valley Bridgeport
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 14.3%
Depression 22.8% 24.0%
Smoking 18.5% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 17.2%
Obesity 28.1% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Prescott valley and Bridgeport at 18.6%.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bridgeport at 24.0% versus 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Bridgeport has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bridgeport at 17.2% compared to 16.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Bridgeport has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prescott valley at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prescott valley Bridgeport
No Schooling 0.8% (399) 0.4% (24)
High School Diploma 17.1% (8,386) 11.2% (708)
Less than High School 12.3% (6,044) 18.8% (1,189)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (7,817) 17.2% (1,086)

Education Levels Comparison: Prescott valley vs Bridgeport

  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Bridgeport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prescott valley hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 18.8%, compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
  • In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Prescott valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.