Demographics details for Pratt, KS vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pratt, KS vs Union springs, AL.
| Data | Pratt | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,067 | 3,242 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 28.1 years |
| Median Income | $61,685 | $24,921 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Pratt vs Union springs
- In Pratt, the population is higher at 9,067, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Pratt have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pratt at 36.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 12% in Pratt.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Pratt vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pratt | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 69 |
| White | 83 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pratt vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 2% in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Union springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Pratt.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 8% in Pratt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pratt at 6% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pratt at 1% compared to 0% in Union springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pratt | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 16.9% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pratt vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union springs at 20.8% versus 19.7% in Pratt.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 39.4% in Pratt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Pratt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pratt | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 3.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (1,362) | 15.1% (489) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (936) | 33.7% (1,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (1,634) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pratt vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Pratt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 10.3% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pratt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.