Demographics details for Pratt, KS vs Fifield, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pratt, KS vs Fifield, WI.
| Data | Pratt | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,067 | 879 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 50.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,685 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Pratt vs Fifield
- In Pratt, the population is higher at 9,067, compared to 879 in Fifield.
- The median age in Fifield is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685 compared to $50,000 in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pratt at 36.0% compared to 20.0% in Fifield.
- Pratt has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fifield.
- Fifield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Pratt vs Fifield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pratt | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pratt vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pratt at 2% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fifield at 100% compared to 83% in Pratt.
- Both Pratt and Fifield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pratt at 8% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pratt at 6% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pratt at 1% compared to 0% in Fifield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pratt | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pratt vs Fifield
- More residents in Pratt report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pratt at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pratt at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pratt at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pratt at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pratt | Fifield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (1,362) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (936) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (1,634) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pratt vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of residents in Pratt have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pratt hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- More residents in Pratt have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pratt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.