Demographics details for Pratt, KS vs Fergus falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pratt, KS vs Fergus falls, MN.
| Data | Pratt | Fergus falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,067 | 14,187 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,685 | $48,738 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Pratt vs Fergus falls
- The population in Fergus falls is higher at 14,187, compared to 9,067 in Pratt.
- The median age in Fergus falls is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685 compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pratt at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Fergus falls.
- Pratt has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fergus falls.
- Fergus falls has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Pratt vs Fergus falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pratt | Fergus falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 93 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pratt vs Fergus falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pratt at 2% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fergus falls at 93% compared to 83% in Pratt.
- In Fergus falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Pratt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pratt at 8% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pratt at 6% compared to 4% in Fergus falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pratt at 1% compared to 0% in Fergus falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pratt | Fergus falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pratt vs Fergus falls
- In Fergus falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fergus falls at 24.4% versus 19.7% in Pratt.
- Fergus falls has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fergus falls at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Pratt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pratt at 39.4% compared to 36.8% in Fergus falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fergus falls at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Pratt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pratt | Fergus falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 0.8% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (1,362) | 14.4% (2,039) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (936) | 8.3% (1,171) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (1,634) | 18.7% (2,656) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pratt vs Fergus falls
- In Fergus falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pratt hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 14.4% in Fergus falls.
- More residents in Pratt have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 8.3% in Fergus falls.
- In Fergus falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Pratt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.