Demographics details for Pratt, KS vs Augusta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pratt, KS vs Augusta, GA.
| Data | Pratt | Augusta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,067 | 202,096 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $61,685 | $50,492 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Pratt vs Augusta
- The population in Augusta is higher at 202,096, compared to 9,067 in Pratt.
- Residents in Pratt have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 34.6 years in Augusta.
- Pratt has a higher median income of $61,685 compared to $50,492 in Augusta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pratt at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Augusta.
- The poverty level is higher in Augusta at 18%, compared to 12% in Pratt.
- Augusta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Pratt vs Augusta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pratt | Augusta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 56 |
| White | 83 | 31 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pratt vs Augusta
- In Augusta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 2% in Pratt.
- Pratt has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 31% in Augusta.
- In Augusta, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Pratt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pratt at 8% compared to 5% in Augusta.
- Both Pratt and Augusta have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pratt at 1% compared to 0% in Augusta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pratt | Augusta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pratt vs Augusta
- In Augusta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Augusta at 21.6% versus 19.7% in Pratt.
- Augusta has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pratt at 19.0% compared to 14.7% in Augusta.
- Augusta has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 39.4% in Pratt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Augusta at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Pratt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pratt | Augusta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 0.8% (1,539) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (1,362) | 17.1% (34,505) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (936) | 10.8% (21,758) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (1,634) | 15.6% (31,482) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pratt vs Augusta
- In Augusta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Pratt.
- In Augusta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Pratt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Augusta at 10.8%, compared to 10.3% in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pratt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 15.6% in Augusta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.