Demographics details for Prairie farm, WI vs Ripley, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prairie farm, WI vs Ripley, TN.
| Data | Prairie farm | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 498 | 7,672 |
| Median Age | 47.9 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $55,192 | $39,454 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Prairie farm vs Ripley
- The population in Ripley is higher at 7,672, compared to 498 in Prairie farm.
- Residents in Prairie farm have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 36.7 years in Ripley.
- Prairie farm has a higher median income of $55,192 compared to $39,454 in Ripley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prairie farm at 45.0% compared to 26.0% in Ripley.
- The poverty level is higher in Ripley at 18%, compared to 10% in Prairie farm.
- Ripley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Prairie farm.
Demographics
Demographics Prairie farm vs Ripley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Prairie farm | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 58 |
| White | 96 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Prairie farm vs Ripley
- In Ripley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 0% in Prairie farm.
- Prairie farm has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 37% in Ripley.
- Both Prairie farm and Ripley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Prairie farm at 2% compared to 1% in Ripley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ripley at 4%, compared to 1% in Prairie farm.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prairie farm at 1% compared to 0% in Ripley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Prairie farm | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 23.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 17.9% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 30.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.1% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 45.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prairie farm vs Ripley
- In Ripley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Prairie farm.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ripley at 27.8% versus 24.2% in Prairie farm.
- Ripley has a higher smoking rate at 30.2% compared to 18.3% in Prairie farm.
- Binge drinking is more common in Prairie farm at 24.1% compared to 11.9% in Ripley.
- Ripley has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 35.7% in Prairie farm.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ripley at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Prairie farm.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Prairie farm | Ripley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 1.1% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 32.3% (161) | 21.9% (1,679) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (58) | 15.3% (1,172) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (34) | 8.2% (632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prairie farm vs Ripley
- In Ripley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Prairie farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prairie farm hold a high school diploma at 32.3% compared to 21.9% in Ripley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ripley at 15.3%, compared to 11.6% in Prairie farm.
- In Ripley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 6.8% in Prairie farm.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.