Demographics details for Prairie farm, WI vs Dixon, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prairie farm, WI vs Dixon, CA.
| Data | Prairie farm | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 498 | 19,143 |
| Median Age | 47.9 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,192 | $92,138 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Prairie farm vs Dixon
- The population in Dixon is higher at 19,143, compared to 498 in Prairie farm.
- Residents in Prairie farm have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 33.5 years in Dixon.
- Dixon has a higher median income of $92,138, compared to $55,192 in Prairie farm.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prairie farm at 45.0% compared to 38.0% in Dixon.
- The poverty level is identical in both Prairie farm and Dixon at 10%.
- Dixon has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Prairie farm.
Demographics
Demographics Prairie farm vs Dixon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Prairie farm | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 96 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 41 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Prairie farm vs Dixon
- In Dixon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Prairie farm.
- Prairie farm has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 40% in Dixon.
- In Dixon, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Prairie farm.
- Dixon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 41%, compared to 2% in Prairie farm.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dixon at 14%, compared to 1% in Prairie farm.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Prairie farm at 1% compared to 0% in Dixon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Prairie farm | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.1% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prairie farm vs Dixon
- In Dixon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.0% in Prairie farm.
- Depression is more prevalent in Prairie farm at 24.2% compared to 19.8% in Dixon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Prairie farm at 18.3% compared to 12.9% in Dixon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Prairie farm at 24.1% compared to 17.2% in Dixon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Prairie farm at 35.7% compared to 31.6% in Dixon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Prairie farm at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Dixon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Prairie farm | Dixon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 2.0% (380) |
| High School Diploma | 32.3% (161) | 15.7% (3,013) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (58) | 18.1% (3,473) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (34) | 14.1% (2,695) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prairie farm vs Dixon
- In Dixon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.2% in Prairie farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prairie farm hold a high school diploma at 32.3% compared to 15.7% in Dixon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dixon at 18.1%, compared to 11.6% in Prairie farm.
- In Dixon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 6.8% in Prairie farm.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.