Demographics details for Prairie farm, WI vs Big bear lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Prairie farm, WI vs Big bear lake, CA.

Data Prairie farm Big bear lake
Population 498 5,031
Median Age 47.9 years 47.5 years
Median Income $55,192 $70,020
Married Families 45.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Prairie farm vs Big bear lake

  • The population in Big bear lake is higher at 5,031, compared to 498 in Prairie farm.
  • Residents in Prairie farm have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 47.5 years in Big bear lake.
  • Big bear lake has a higher median income of $70,020, compared to $55,192 in Prairie farm.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Prairie farm at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Big bear lake.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Prairie farm and Big bear lake at 10%.
  • Big bear lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Prairie farm.

Demographics

Demographics Prairie farm vs Big bear lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Prairie farm Big bear lake
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 96 50
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 2 30
Two or More Races 1 16
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Prairie farm vs Big bear lake

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Prairie farm and Big bear lake at 0%.
  • Prairie farm has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
  • In Big bear lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Prairie farm.
  • Big bear lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Prairie farm.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big bear lake at 16%, compared to 1% in Prairie farm.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Prairie farm and Big bear lake at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Prairie farm Big bear lake
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.1%
Depression 24.2% 20.5%
Smoking 18.3% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 24.1% 17.0%
Obesity 35.7% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Prairie farm vs Big bear lake

  • In Big bear lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.0% in Prairie farm.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Prairie farm at 24.2% compared to 20.5% in Big bear lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Prairie farm at 18.3% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Prairie farm at 24.1% compared to 17.0% in Big bear lake.
  • Big bear lake has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 35.7% in Prairie farm.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Prairie farm at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Prairie farm Big bear lake
No Schooling 0.2% (1) 0.7% (37)
High School Diploma 32.3% (161) 16.4% (825)
Less than High School 11.6% (58) 12.6% (634)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.8% (34) 25.7% (1,294)

Education Levels Comparison: Prairie farm vs Big bear lake

  • In Big bear lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Prairie farm.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Prairie farm hold a high school diploma at 32.3% compared to 16.4% in Big bear lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big bear lake at 12.6%, compared to 11.6% in Prairie farm.
  • In Big bear lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 6.8% in Prairie farm.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.