Demographics details for Pownal, ME vs Clayton, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pownal, ME vs Clayton, OK.
Data | Pownal | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,548 | 555 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $75,000 | $27,083 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pownal vs Clayton
- In Pownal, the population is higher at 1,548, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- Residents in Pownal have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Pownal has a higher median income of $75,000 compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 30.0% in Pownal.
- Pownal has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.1% in Pownal.
Demographics
Demographics Pownal vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pownal | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 98 | 51 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 20 |
Demographics Comparison: Pownal vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Pownal.
- Pownal has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- Both Pownal and Clayton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Pownal.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 23%, compared to 0% in Pownal.
- In Clayton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 0% in Pownal.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pownal | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 21.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.6% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 28.8% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 26.6% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.4% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 40.2% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pownal vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 28.8% versus 0.0% in Pownal.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pownal | Clayton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 37.5% (208) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.5% (108) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.7% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pownal vs Clayton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pownal and Clayton at 0.0%.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.5% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 19.5%, compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Pownal.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.