Demographics details for Powhatan, VA vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Powhatan, VA vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Powhatan | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,489 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 45.6 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $108,089 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Powhatan vs Coalinga
- In Powhatan, the population is higher at 31,489, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Powhatan have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Powhatan has a higher median income of $108,089 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Powhatan at 49.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 4% in Powhatan.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 2.6% in Powhatan.
Demographics
Demographics Powhatan vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Powhatan | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 4 |
| White | 85 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Powhatan vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powhatan at 9% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Powhatan has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Powhatan.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 2% in Powhatan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 4% in Powhatan.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Powhatan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Powhatan | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Powhatan vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Powhatan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Powhatan at 22.9% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 14.2% in Powhatan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Powhatan at 19.9% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 33.7% in Powhatan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Powhatan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Powhatan | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (182) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (4,711) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 10.5% (3,300) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.9% (7,526) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Powhatan vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.6% in Powhatan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Powhatan hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 10.5% in Powhatan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Powhatan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.9% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.