Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Wakita, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Wakita, OK.

Data Powder springs Wakita
Population 17,337 307
Median Age 38.7 years 35.5 years
Median Income $88,311 $34,375
Married Families 36.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Wakita

  • In Powder springs, the population is higher at 17,337, compared to 307 in Wakita.
  • Residents in Powder springs have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 35.5 years in Wakita.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $34,375 in Wakita.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Powder springs at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Wakita.
  • The poverty level is higher in Wakita at 15%, compared to 12% in Powder springs.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Powder springs and Wakita at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Powder springs vs Wakita provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Powder springs Wakita
Black 51 Data is updating
White 22 74
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 20
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Wakita

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 0% in Wakita.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wakita at 74% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Powder springs at 2% compared to 0% in Wakita.
  • Wakita has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 19% in Powder springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Powder springs at 5% compared to 4% in Wakita.
  • In Wakita, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Powder springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Powder springs Wakita
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 11.4%
Depression 17.7% 25.5%
Smoking 14.4% 17.8%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 15.8%
Obesity 33.0% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Wakita

  • In Wakita, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wakita at 25.5% versus 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Wakita has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wakita at 15.8% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Wakita has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wakita at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Powder springs Wakita
No Schooling 1.3% (225) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,598) 25.1% (77)
Less than High School 7.6% (1,309) 10.4% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (4,561) 11.4% (35)

Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Wakita

  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Wakita.
  • In Wakita, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wakita at 10.4%, compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 11.4% in Wakita.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.