Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Randleman, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Randleman, NC.

Data Powder springs Randleman
Population 17,337 4,642
Median Age 38.7 years 33.5 years
Median Income $88,311 $63,040
Married Families 36.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Randleman

  • In Powder springs, the population is higher at 17,337, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
  • Residents in Powder springs have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $63,040 in Randleman.
  • In Randleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Randleman.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Powder springs and Randleman at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Powder springs vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Powder springs Randleman
Black 51 4
White 22 77
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 9
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Randleman

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 4% in Randleman.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Randleman at 77% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Powder springs at 2% compared to 0% in Randleman.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Powder springs at 19% compared to 9% in Randleman.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Powder springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Powder springs Randleman
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 12.0%
Depression 17.7% 25.7%
Smoking 14.4% 19.4%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 17.7%
Obesity 33.0% 37.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Randleman

  • In Randleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Randleman at 25.7% versus 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Randleman has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Randleman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Powder springs Randleman
No Schooling 1.3% (225) 0.3% (16)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,598) 16.5% (768)
Less than High School 7.6% (1,309) 22.1% (1,026)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (4,561) 6.9% (320)

Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Randleman

  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
  • In Randleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.