Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Protem, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Protem, MO.

Data Powder springs Protem
Population 17,337 408
Median Age 38.7 years 42.0 years
Median Income $88,311 $40,000
Married Families 36.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Protem

  • In Powder springs, the population is higher at 17,337, compared to 408 in Protem.
  • The median age in Protem is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.7 years in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $40,000 in Protem.
  • In Protem, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Powder springs and Protem at 12%.
  • Protem has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Powder springs vs Protem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Powder springs Protem
Black 51 3
White 22 95
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 2
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Protem

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 3% in Protem.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Protem at 95% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Powder springs at 2% compared to 0% in Protem.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Powder springs at 19% compared to 2% in Protem.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Powder springs at 5% compared to 0% in Protem.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Powder springs at 1% compared to 0% in Protem.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Powder springs Protem
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% Data is updating%
Depression 17.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 14.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 33.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Protem

  • More residents in Powder springs report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Powder springs at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Powder springs at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Powder springs at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Powder springs at 33.0% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Powder springs at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Protem.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Powder springs Protem
No Schooling 1.3% (225) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,598) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 7.6% (1,309) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (4,561) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Protem

  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • More residents in Powder springs have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 0.0% in Protem.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Protem.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.