Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Davenport, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Davenport, WA.

Data Powder springs Davenport
Population 17,337 1,778
Median Age 38.7 years 36.2 years
Median Income $88,311 $71,486
Married Families 36.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Davenport

  • In Powder springs, the population is higher at 17,337, compared to 1,778 in Davenport.
  • Residents in Powder springs have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 36.2 years in Davenport.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $71,486 in Davenport.
  • In Davenport, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Davenport.
  • The unemployment rate in Powder springs is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Davenport.

Demographics

Demographics Powder springs vs Davenport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Powder springs Davenport
Black 51 2
White 22 83
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 19 7
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Davenport

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 2% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Davenport at 83% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • Both Powder springs and Davenport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Powder springs at 19% compared to 7% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Davenport at 6%, compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Powder springs at 1% compared to 0% in Davenport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Powder springs Davenport
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 11.5%
Depression 17.7% 27.3%
Smoking 14.4% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 18.8%
Obesity 33.0% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Davenport

  • In Davenport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Davenport at 27.3% versus 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Davenport has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Davenport at 18.8% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Powder springs at 33.0% compared to 31.8% in Davenport.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Davenport at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Powder springs Davenport
No Schooling 1.3% (225) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,598) 14.5% (258)
Less than High School 7.6% (1,309) 8.2% (145)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (4,561) 16.4% (292)

Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Davenport

  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Davenport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 14.5% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Davenport at 8.2%, compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 16.4% in Davenport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.