Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Brookings, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Brookings, SD.
Data | Powder springs | Brookings |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,337 | 23,993 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 24.5 years |
Median Income | $88,311 | $57,824 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Brookings
- The population in Brookings is higher at 23,993, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
- Residents in Powder springs have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
- Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $57,824 in Brookings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Powder springs at 36.0% compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
- The poverty level is identical in both Powder springs and Brookings at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Powder springs is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.3% in Brookings.
Demographics
Demographics Powder springs vs Brookings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Powder springs | Brookings |
---|---|---|
Black | 51 | 2 |
White | 22 | 84 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 19 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Brookings
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 2% in Brookings.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookings at 84% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
- In Brookings, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Powder springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Powder springs at 19% compared to 4% in Brookings.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Powder springs at 5% compared to 4% in Brookings.
- In Brookings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Powder springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Powder springs | Brookings |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 8.7% |
Depression | 17.7% | 18.7% |
Smoking | 14.4% | 14.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 20.5% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 34.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Brookings
- More residents in Powder springs report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookings at 18.7% versus 17.7% in Powder springs.
- Brookings has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brookings at 20.5% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
- Brookings has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Powder springs at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Brookings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Powder springs | Brookings |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (225) | 0.2% (58) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (2,598) | 7.7% (1,837) |
Less than High School | 7.6% (1,309) | 3.4% (822) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (4,561) | 23.1% (5,531) |
Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Brookings
- A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
- A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 7.7% in Brookings.
- More residents in Powder springs have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 3.4% in Brookings.
- A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 23.1% in Brookings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.