Demographics details for Potts camp, MS vs Richlands, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Potts camp, MS vs Richlands, NC.
| Data | Potts camp | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 409 | 2,355 |
| Median Age | 45.6 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $21,845 | $59,333 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Potts camp vs Richlands
- The population in Richlands is higher at 2,355, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- Residents in Potts camp have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher median income of $59,333, compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- In Richlands, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 9% in Richlands.
- The unemployment rate in Potts camp is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Richlands.
Demographics
Demographics Potts camp vs Richlands provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Potts camp | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 17 |
| White | 80 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Potts camp vs Richlands
- In Richlands, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 13% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 65% in Richlands.
- In Richlands, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Potts camp.
- Richlands has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- Both Potts camp and Richlands have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Potts camp and Richlands at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Potts camp | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Potts camp vs Richlands
- More residents in Potts camp report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.5% in Richlands.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richlands at 23.5% versus 23.0% in Potts camp.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Potts camp at 21.7% compared to 16.6% in Richlands.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richlands at 17.4% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
- Obesity rates are higher in Potts camp at 41.8% compared to 36.7% in Richlands.
- Disability percentages are higher in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Potts camp | Richlands |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (2) | 0.8% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (56) | 18.9% (445) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (49) | 11.6% (273) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (33) | 17.3% (408) |
Education Levels Comparison: Potts camp vs Richlands
- In Richlands, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
- In Richlands, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
- More residents in Potts camp have less than a high school education at 12.0% compared to 11.6% in Richlands.
- In Richlands, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.