Demographics details for Potts camp, MS vs Mount vernon, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Potts camp, MS vs Mount vernon, TX.

Data Potts camp Mount vernon
Population 409 2,541
Median Age 45.6 years 31.1 years
Median Income $21,845 $63,750
Married Families 20.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 25% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Potts camp vs Mount vernon

  • The population in Mount vernon is higher at 2,541, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
  • Residents in Potts camp have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 31.1 years in Mount vernon.
  • Mount vernon has a higher median income of $63,750, compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • In Mount vernon, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 10% in Mount vernon.
  • The unemployment rate in Potts camp is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Mount vernon.

Demographics

Demographics Potts camp vs Mount vernon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Potts camp Mount vernon
Black 13 15
White 80 50
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 21
Two or More Races 7 14
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Potts camp vs Mount vernon

  • In Mount vernon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 13% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 50% in Mount vernon.
  • Both Potts camp and Mount vernon have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Mount vernon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mount vernon at 14%, compared to 7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Potts camp and Mount vernon at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Potts camp Mount vernon
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 11.8%
Depression 23.0% 24.9%
Smoking 21.7% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 18.5%
Obesity 41.8% 35.4%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Potts camp vs Mount vernon

  • In Mount vernon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.4% in Potts camp.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mount vernon at 24.9% versus 23.0% in Potts camp.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Potts camp at 21.7% compared to 17.6% in Mount vernon.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount vernon at 18.5% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Potts camp at 41.8% compared to 35.4% in Mount vernon.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Mount vernon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Potts camp Mount vernon
No Schooling 0.5% (2) 0.6% (16)
High School Diploma 13.7% (56) 15.7% (399)
Less than High School 12.0% (49) 21.8% (555)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (33) 11.1% (282)

Education Levels Comparison: Potts camp vs Mount vernon

  • In Mount vernon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
  • In Mount vernon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount vernon at 21.8%, compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
  • In Mount vernon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.