Demographics details for Potts camp, MS vs Menomonee falls, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Potts camp, MS vs Menomonee falls, WI.

Data Potts camp Menomonee falls
Population 409 39,246
Median Age 45.6 years 41.9 years
Median Income $21,845 $96,986
Married Families 20.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 25% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 2.8

Population Comparison: Potts camp vs Menomonee falls

  • The population in Menomonee falls is higher at 39,246, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
  • Residents in Potts camp have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 41.9 years in Menomonee falls.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher median income of $96,986, compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • In Menomonee falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 5% in Menomonee falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Potts camp is higher at 5.2%, compared to 2.8% in Menomonee falls.

Demographics

Demographics Potts camp vs Menomonee falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Potts camp Menomonee falls
Black 13 4
White 80 82
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races 7 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Potts camp vs Menomonee falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Potts camp at 13% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Menomonee falls at 82% compared to 80% in Potts camp.
  • In Menomonee falls, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Potts camp.
  • Menomonee falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Potts camp at 7% compared to 4% in Menomonee falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Potts camp and Menomonee falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Potts camp Menomonee falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 7.7%
Depression 23.0% 20.0%
Smoking 21.7% 11.6%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 25.0%
Obesity 41.8% 33.4%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Potts camp vs Menomonee falls

  • More residents in Potts camp report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 12.7% in Menomonee falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Potts camp at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Menomonee falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Potts camp at 21.7% compared to 11.6% in Menomonee falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Menomonee falls at 25.0% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Potts camp at 41.8% compared to 33.4% in Menomonee falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Menomonee falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Potts camp Menomonee falls
No Schooling 0.5% (2) 0.3% (117)
High School Diploma 13.7% (56) 14.9% (5,834)
Less than High School 12.0% (49) 4.9% (1,936)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (33) 33.4% (13,122)

Education Levels Comparison: Potts camp vs Menomonee falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Potts camp have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Menomonee falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
  • More residents in Potts camp have less than a high school education at 12.0% compared to 4.9% in Menomonee falls.
  • In Menomonee falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.