Demographics details for Potts camp, MS vs Hackensack, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Potts camp, MS vs Hackensack, NJ.

Data Potts camp Hackensack
Population 409 45,633
Median Age 45.6 years 40.0 years
Median Income $21,845 $79,133
Married Families 20.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 25% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.0

Population Comparison: Potts camp vs Hackensack

  • The population in Hackensack is higher at 45,633, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
  • Residents in Potts camp have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 40.0 years in Hackensack.
  • Hackensack has a higher median income of $79,133, compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • In Hackensack, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 9% in Hackensack.
  • The unemployment rate in Potts camp is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.0% in Hackensack.

Demographics

Demographics Potts camp vs Hackensack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Potts camp Hackensack
Black 13 20
White 80 17
Asian Data is updating 13
Hispanic Data is updating 37
Two or More Races 7 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Potts camp vs Hackensack

  • In Hackensack, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 13% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 17% in Hackensack.
  • In Hackensack, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 0% in Potts camp.
  • Hackensack has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hackensack at 13%, compared to 7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Potts camp and Hackensack at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Potts camp Hackensack
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 9.9%
Depression 23.0% 15.7%
Smoking 21.7% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 15.5%
Obesity 41.8% 30.5%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Potts camp vs Hackensack

  • More residents in Potts camp report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in Hackensack.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Potts camp at 23.0% compared to 15.7% in Hackensack.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Potts camp at 21.7% compared to 13.5% in Hackensack.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hackensack at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Potts camp at 41.8% compared to 30.5% in Hackensack.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Hackensack.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Potts camp Hackensack
No Schooling 0.5% (2) 3.3% (1,520)
High School Diploma 13.7% (56) 17.2% (7,861)
Less than High School 12.0% (49) 19.0% (8,680)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (33) 31.8% (14,527)

Education Levels Comparison: Potts camp vs Hackensack

  • In Hackensack, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
  • In Hackensack, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hackensack at 19.0%, compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
  • In Hackensack, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.