Demographics details for Portsmouth, VA vs Rockford, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Portsmouth, VA vs Rockford, IL.
Data | Portsmouth | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Population | 97,029 | 146,713 |
Median Age | 35.6 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $57,154 | $50,744 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Portsmouth vs Rockford
- The population in Rockford is higher at 146,713, compared to 97,029 in Portsmouth.
- The median age in Rockford is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.6 years in Portsmouth.
- Portsmouth has a higher median income of $57,154 compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 30.0% in Portsmouth.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockford at 20%, compared to 15% in Portsmouth.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 3.6% in Portsmouth.
Demographics
Demographics Portsmouth vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Portsmouth | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Black | 52 | 22 |
White | 35 | 46 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 5 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Portsmouth vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Portsmouth at 52% compared to 22% in Rockford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockford at 46% compared to 35% in Portsmouth.
- In Rockford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Portsmouth.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 9%, compared to 7% in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Portsmouth and Rockford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Portsmouth | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.9% |
Depression | 21.0% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 47.1% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Portsmouth vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Portsmouth.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 21.0%.
- Rockford has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 18.5% in Portsmouth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Portsmouth at 15.0% compared to 14.8% in Rockford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Portsmouth at 47.1% compared to 44.3% in Rockford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Portsmouth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Portsmouth | Rockford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (737) | 1.2% (1,781) |
High School Diploma | 17.5% (17,012) | 16.4% (24,126) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (9,309) | 17.1% (25,088) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (13,933) | 15.5% (22,792) |
Education Levels Comparison: Portsmouth vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Portsmouth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Portsmouth hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockford at 17.1%, compared to 9.6% in Portsmouth.
- In Rockford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Portsmouth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.