Demographics details for Portsmouth, VA vs Elk city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Portsmouth, VA vs Elk city, KS.
| Data | Portsmouth | Elk city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,029 | 257 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 45.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,154 | $31,250 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Portsmouth vs Elk city
- In Portsmouth, the population is higher at 97,029, compared to 257 in Elk city.
- The median age in Elk city is higher at 45.9 years, compared to 35.6 years in Portsmouth.
- Portsmouth has a higher median income of $57,154 compared to $31,250 in Elk city.
- In Elk city, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 30.0% in Portsmouth.
- Portsmouth has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Elk city.
- Elk city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.6% in Portsmouth.
Demographics
Demographics Portsmouth vs Elk city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Portsmouth | Elk city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | Data is updating |
| White | 35 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Portsmouth vs Elk city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Portsmouth at 52% compared to 0% in Elk city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk city at 87% compared to 35% in Portsmouth.
- The Asian population is larger in Portsmouth at 1% compared to 0% in Elk city.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Portsmouth and Elk city at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elk city at 8%, compared to 7% in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Portsmouth and Elk city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Portsmouth | Elk city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 47.1% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Portsmouth vs Elk city
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Portsmouth and Elk city at 17.1%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Elk city at 22.6% versus 21.0% in Portsmouth.
- Elk city has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 18.5% in Portsmouth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk city at 19.7% compared to 15.0% in Portsmouth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Portsmouth at 47.1% compared to 41.7% in Elk city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elk city at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Portsmouth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Portsmouth | Elk city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (737) | 0.8% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (17,012) | 21.8% (56) |
| Less than High School | 9.6% (9,309) | 13.6% (35) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (13,933) | 3.5% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Portsmouth vs Elk city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Portsmouth and Elk city at 0.8%.
- In Elk city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.8% compared to 17.5% in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Elk city at 13.6%, compared to 9.6% in Portsmouth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Portsmouth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 3.5% in Elk city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.